The audio is muted throughout while the narrator insinuates that the parents may be actors. However, if you watch the clip with the audio unmuted, it's obvious that the couple is happy because they are reminiscing about positive memories of their daughter. What's the motivation for promoting fallacious claims that seem compelling on the surface, and which ultimately aims to stir up fear about gun control? You can draw your own conclusions.ĭebunking the Sandy hook conspiracy video, point-by-point And of course, the video creator knew this, muted the audio and used this as evidence to create suspicion in the viewer. Theory 1: The first thing the video tries to allege is that there is a second shooter.
They love to grab early media footage and then use that as "evidence" of their claims, as if the media's first reporting is somehow golden. Odd that conspiracy theorists distrust the media, then turn around and use its raw reporting claims as evidence. Anyway, you can easily google and figure out who the guy in the woods was. He is the father of a student there and the athletic director at the highschool. He was on his way to the school to help make gingerbread houses with 1st graders when he heard the shots. He was unarmed, arrested, detained, questioned, and let go.
0 kommentar(er)
